Comparative Effect of Conventional vs. Device-Assisted Myofascial Release on Pain and ROM in Upper Trapezius Trigger Points
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/920rck63Keywords:
Myofascial release, IASTM, trigger points, cervical pain, randomized controlled trial, physiotherapyAbstract
Background: Myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius are a common source of neck pain and functional limitation. Conventional myofascial release is widely used, but device-assisted techniques may provide deeper and more consistent mechanical effects, potentially improving clinical outcomes. Objective: To compare the short-term effects of device-assisted versus conventional myofascial release on pain, cervical range of motion, pressure pain threshold, disability, muscle stiffness, and patient satisfaction. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 66 participants with upper trapezius trigger points were allocated to either conventional manual myofascial release or device-assisted myofascial release for six sessions over three weeks. Outcomes were measured at baseline and post-intervention using VAS, goniometry, algometry, MyotonPRO stiffness assessment, and the Neck Disability Index. Between-group differences were analyzed using ANCOVA, correlations using Pearson coefficients, and predictors of pain reduction using multiple linear regression. Results: Device-assisted myofascial release produced significantly greater reductions in pain (−4.2 vs −3.0), larger improvements in cervical ROM (+14–17° vs +8–10°), higher pressure pain threshold (+2.3 vs +1.4 kg/cm²), greater reductions in disability (−24.6% vs −16.2%), and lower muscle stiffness (p < 0.001). Regression analysis identified device-assisted treatment as an independent predictor of pain reduction (β = 1.18, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Device-assisted myofascial release is superior to conventional manual techniques for short-term management of upper trapezius trigger points. Keywords: Myofascial release, IASTM, trigger points, cervical pain, randomized controlled trial, physiotherapy
References
1. Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Travell and Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
2. Bron C, Dommerholt J. Etiology of Myofascial Trigger Points. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16(5):439–444.
3. Barnes MF. The Basic Science of Myofascial Release. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 1997;1(4):231–238.
4. Ajimsha MS, Al-Mudahka NR, Al-Madzhar JA. Effectiveness of Myofascial Release: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:561753.
5. Hammer WI. Functional Soft-Tissue Examination and Treatment by Manual Methods. 3rd ed. Sudbury (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2007.
6. Cheatham SW, Lee M, Cain M, Baker R. The Efficacy of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization: A Systematic Review. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(5):1–14.
7. Laudner K, Compton BD, McLoda TA, Walters CM. Acute Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization for Improving Posterior Shoulder Range of Motion in Collegiate Baseball Players. J Athl Train. 2014;49(1):1–7.
8. Langevin HM. Connective Tissue: A Body-Wide Signaling Network? J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2006;10(2):92–101.
9. Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Simons DG, Cuadrado ML, Pareja JA. The Role of Myofascial Trigger Points in Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes of the Head and Neck. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(4):278–285.
10. Borg-Stein J. Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011;15(5):346–352.
11. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 5th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 2016.
12. Kalkhoven JT, Watsford ML, Impellizzeri FM. A Conceptual Framework and Statistical Model for Measuring the Effect Size of Myofascial Interventions. Man Ther. 2019;44:1–10.
13. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
14. Tozzi P. Selected Fascial Aspects of Osteopathic Practice. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012;16(4):1–10.
15. Baker RT, Nasypany A, Seegmiller JG, Baker JG. Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Treatment: A Neurophysiological Rationale. J Man Manip Ther. 2015;23(3):1–9.
16. Schleip R. Fascial Plasticity: A New Neurobiological Explanation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2003;7(1):11– 19.
17. Stanek JM, Sullivan T, Davis S. Comparison of Compressive Myofascial Release and Instrument- Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization for Improving Range of Motion and Muscle Performance. Sports Health. 2018;10(3):1–9.
